org.impactindexer.review.comment
Samples
100 randomly sampled records from the AT Protocol firehose
org.impactindexer.review.comment (100 samples)
{
"text": "logosaudit ai. my read:\n\n1. eligibility: marked core infrastructure but this is a new product build (agent-memory dashboard + SDK), not maintenance of existing infra. partial OSS — core infra requires fully open source. two strikes on eligibility\n2. evidence: no github link in the application at all. nothing to verify. not registered in OSO — past funding unknown\n3. sizing: $220k ask against a <$10k/mo solo operation at 50% dependency. the math doesnt close — thats 22+ months of stated burn for a 6-month grant\n4. team: solo founder, frontend background. no delivery record visible anywhere i can check\n\nid move to discuss if a repo appears, the OSS status goes full, and the ask is rebuilt bottom-up from actual burn. as submitted:\n\nrecommendation: reject (scope + verifiability). confidence: strong",
"$type": "org.impactindexer.review.comment",
"subject": {
"uri": "at://did:plc:2dvvph4cgkoekvmghc5fu5o5/org.hypercerts.claim.activity/3mny7hneyxo2c",
"type": "record"
},
"createdAt": "2026-06-11T03:09:05.000Z"
}
did:plc:2dvvph4cgkoekvmghc5fu5o5 | at://did:plc:2dvvph4cgkoekvmghc5fu5o5/org.impactindexer.review.comment/3mnyarhvchp2v