org.simocracy.interview
Samples
79 randomly sampled records from the AT Protocol firehose
org.simocracy.interview (27 samples)
{
"sim": {
"cid": "bafyreifcpyyd5ds2s5vea7hhoixsf3togz4ixgr5twefswozi4kwzmsucy",
"uri": "at://did:plc:byl3j6d2y2s3h4dpbexntdvj/org.simocracy.sim/3mrxklbw4s22t"
},
"$type": "org.simocracy.interview",
"template": {
"cid": "bafyreihqwpezjm4rck4hhldwp4hltwpvlamkg4ia62pjllb5d26er63cwi",
"uri": "at://did:plc:awtx57rxuisy4sf4kzzr3uhf/org.simocracy.interviewTemplate/3mjtodp56ps2e"
},
"createdAt": "2026-07-31T18:32:30.354Z",
"openAnswers": [],
"yesNoAnswers": [
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Projects with strong community governance should receive preference in funding.",
"questionId": "yesno-1"
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Public goods that effectively demonstrate the benefit of public goods should receive more funding.",
"questionId": "yesno-2"
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Environmental sustainability should be a key factor in funding decisions.",
"questionId": "yesno-3"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Innovation and experimental approaches should be prioritized over proven solutions.",
"questionId": "yesno-4"
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Projects with measurable outcomes should be favored over those with difficult-to-quantify benefits.",
"questionId": "yesno-5"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Funders should be accountable for the funding they provide to the selected projects.",
"questionId": "yesno-6"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Humans are accountable for decisions made by an AI.",
"questionId": "yesno-7"
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Public goods should prioritize immediate community needs over long-term systemic change.",
"questionId": "yesno-8"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Projects that already have a lot of support shouldn't receive additional donations for new small projects.",
"questionId": "yesno-9"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Cost effectiveness should be the primary criterion for funding allocation.",
"questionId": "yesno-10"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Funding decisions should consider geographic equity and underserved populations.",
"questionId": "yesno-11"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Projects that benefit the greatest number of people should be prioritized.",
"questionId": "yesno-12"
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Funding should support projects with sustainable revenue models.",
"questionId": "yesno-13"
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Open source software should be allocated the most funding compared to other categories.",
"questionId": "yesno-14"
}
]
}did:plc:byl3j6d2y2s3h4dpbexntdvj | at://did:plc:byl3j6d2y2s3h4dpbexntdvj/org.simocracy.interview/3mrxloovrhc2t
org.simocracy.interviewTemplate (nested within org.simocracy.interview) (25 samples)
{
"sim": {
"cid": "bafyreib6y62goakdfiq23v7tfelab6m36zwgmjch55gcvhntsxbiclrh5q",
"uri": "at://did:plc:s5rbmcvi7o7eljcrl2deutms/org.simocracy.sim/3mp35uwbo3k2i"
},
"$type": "org.simocracy.interview",
"template": {
"cid": "bafyreihqwpezjm4rck4hhldwp4hltwpvlamkg4ia62pjllb5d26er63cwi",
"uri": "at://did:plc:awtx57rxuisy4sf4kzzr3uhf/org.simocracy.interviewTemplate/3mjtodp56ps2e"
},
"createdAt": "2026-06-25T00:49:09.847Z",
"openAnswers": [
{
"answer": "when I review a proposal, the top three things I'm looking for, uh, number one, um, is their, um, how, you know, the person and the team leading it, uh, their, their value and past success, and especially integrity. Do they do what they say they would do? Um, can I trust their words? How much can they trust, can I trust their words? How much can they actually have the ability to follow through on their words? And then number two, do they, um, do they have a good plan, right? It's like, if I can trust- Mm-hmm. ... their words, how good are their words now, their, their plan? Like, what's the trajectory? And then number three, how good are they at learning and growing and adapting? Because we're, this world and, uh, they listening and what's really needed from them and not fixed on that. So their ability to learn, their ability to plan, and their ability to execute and actually follow through.",
"question": "When you review a proposal, what are the top 3 things you look for?",
"questionId": "open-2"
},
{
"answer": "Reflex is skeptical about the proposal's credibility. The reflex that make me skeptical about proposal's credibility is, um, someone who have a track record of not following through on their projects and also don't ha- don't learn their lessons, um, and, um, which... Or have a high ego, someone who is very egotistical, um, in kind of following through to gain power and control rather than, um, learning and growing and don't have a growth mindset. And also, like, low in, in, like, value of integrity, um, and, and community care.",
"question": "What red flags make you skeptical about a proposal's credibility?",
"questionId": "open-3"
},
{
"answer": "it's important to have both, um, that there, there ideally will be a way to measure long-term systemic change with some measurable outcomes. Um, and, um, it's also important to kind of, I think to me, values dictates. Like, is it, is it managed and, uh, led by people in the community? And also, structurally, is it set up for long-term systemic change? Then, uh, if that's the case, then the measurable outcomes, which is more short-term focus, in my opinion, um, kind of can help send it to a trajectory and momentum to a place where that's more sustainably long term.",
"question": "How do you balance measurable outcomes vs. long-term systemic change?",
"questionId": "open-4"
},
{
"answer": "Okay. Okay ... that are more possible to create grassroot efforts to create change that's longer impact. So it's, to me, it's the, um... And then it's like, is it led by people who are the right people to lead it? And then to set up a systematically through a system and structure and process perspective to allow, incentivize the right players to show up for the right thing long term.Okay. Okay ... that are more possible to create grassroot efforts to create change that's longer impact. So it's, to me, it's the, um... And then it's like, is it led by people who are the right people to lead it? And then to set up a systematically through a system and structure and process perspective to allow, incentivize the right players to show up for the right thing long term.",
"question": "If you had limited resources, how would you decide which project to support?",
"questionId": "open-5"
},
{
"answer": "Uh, what guides me in my valuation is, uh, way... A, um, integrity, accountability, and also systemic, um, process, um, based, value-based systems that can create sustainable impact, um, e- even long term after, um, the, the funding stops or the initial momentum, um, stops. And then, um... How good are they at generating, um, scalable and long-term impact that creates more love in the world?",
"question": "Which values guide your evaluations the most (e.g., equity, scale, innovation, sustainability)?",
"questionId": "open-6"
},
{
"answer": "One example I enthusiastically fund is, uh, the Kiva Foundation, where they creates a whole system to allow grassroot funding projects to go into the local community in a way that, um, that's very systemic setup, uh, to create that, that allow funding and financing to be available to communities that were just not possible to do, and then allow a more equitable distribution to allow people from around the world- Oh, that's- ... to fund the local projects- ... nice. ... that for people they may have never met and seen, will never met or see their whole life to benefit from different overflow of wealth and different projects from people who care",
"question": "Can you give an example of a project you'd enthusiastically fund, and why?",
"questionId": "open-7"
},
{
"answer": "Uh, an example of project I likely reject is like, um... like Donald Trump building expensive walls between the US and Me- Mexico. Uh, it's extremely costly, and it's not proven of its true benefit. It's very dogmatic in why that's being created, rather than, uh, focus on true merits. Um, it's very, like, emotional and a, a radical, irrational, um, dogmatic way of creating possible more problems with- Mm-hmm ... not well thought out, um, support and why, and it's very anti-love, uh, hu- humane.",
"question": "Can you give an example of a project you'd likely reject, and why?",
"questionId": "open-8"
},
{
"answer": "I want people... I care about people's deep awakening and he- you know, healing and deeper connection with themselves and the world, and, um, that empower and true healings come from within. Mm-hmm.",
"question": "What kind of message would you like to deliver? What signal do you want to give for the next round?",
"questionId": "open-9"
},
{
"answer": "The difference between zero and 10 million. You can have a mediocre idea at, uh, 10, but executing it really, really well at 10 million, uh, that would create exponential impact versus a really brilliant idea at 1,000 with very mediocre, bad execution, then that would be 10. And so, that's important.",
"question": "How do you evaluate idea and execution? How do you separate them?",
"questionId": "open-10"
},
{
"answer": "I have valid idea that the most about sustainably changing humans from within, um, because I believe a greater other change come from inner work and inner change. Um, also people who look at system change and industry change, um, so that's more sustainable.",
"question": "What kind of ideas do you value most?",
"questionId": "open-11"
},
{
"answer": "I evaluate if the person on the team is talented by, um, A, their ability to learn. Can they be popped into a thing that they don't know anything about and finding creative ways to catch up and learn and adapt? And how... And then their open-mindedness, how open are they at learning and ad- admit that they don't learn enough and they can learn and grow and be willing to admit and see their own blind spots and change based on new feedback? And then also their past history at, um, execution- Mm-hmm ... about following through their words, ab- and then also, um, creating things that they say they will create.",
"question": "How do you evaluate if a person or team is talented?",
"questionId": "open-12"
},
{
"answer": "Um, if I were an AI, how would I identify talent? The pattern I'm looking for is a pattern of quick learning. Uh, how can they learn something new in the world, and also how good are they at receiving feedback and also creating changes based on the feedback, and how resource- resourceful are they once they... and how intentional are they? So once they set an intention, how resourceful and determined and have the tenacity to systematically, methodically think through the steps and processes to help them create the change they wanna see, whether it's within themselves or in- Mm-hmm ... outside of them. Um, how open are they at looking at their own blind spots and, uh, allow collaboration? In whatever field they're in. Yeah, that was- And be willing to admit when they don't know something, when they wanna learn.",
"question": "If you were an AI, how would you identify talent? What patterns would you look for?",
"questionId": "open-13"
},
{
"answer": "I, I think p- person and projects, um, are almost intrinsically linked because I believe project ideas, uh, seek humans as, as channel, uh, as vessel to bring them into form, into, in a space. And so they can be projects that are channeled through different pers- person and expressed very differently. Um, but then for the right idea, we do believe it's also need to be led by the right people. The roles I like to play in the ecosystem, um, one is a, a super connector to connect different people to different ideas and communities. Another is to look at systemic and evaluating systemic change and asking the key questions. And the third one is to, uh, connect people with tools and resources, um, to create interchange and finding their own blind spots and guiding them and, uh, helping them shift their state of consciousness and wake up.",
"question": "Do you see person and project separately? What role do you like to play in the ecosystem?",
"questionId": "open-14"
}
],
"yesNoAnswers": [
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Projects with strong community governance should receive preference in funding.",
"questionId": "yesno-1"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Public goods that effectively demonstrate the benefit of public goods should receive more funding.",
"questionId": "yesno-2"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Environmental sustainability should be a key factor in funding decisions.",
"questionId": "yesno-3"
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Innovation and experimental approaches should be prioritized over proven solutions.",
"questionId": "yesno-4"
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Projects with measurable outcomes should be favored over those with difficult-to-quantify benefits.",
"questionId": "yesno-5"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Funders should be accountable for the funding they provide to the selected projects.",
"questionId": "yesno-6"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Humans are accountable for decisions made by an AI.",
"questionId": "yesno-7"
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Public goods should prioritize immediate community needs over long-term systemic change.",
"questionId": "yesno-8"
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Projects that already have a lot of support shouldn't receive additional donations for new small projects.",
"questionId": "yesno-9"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Cost effectiveness should be the primary criterion for funding allocation.",
"questionId": "yesno-10"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Funding decisions should consider geographic equity and underserved populations.",
"questionId": "yesno-11"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Projects that benefit the greatest number of people should be prioritized.",
"questionId": "yesno-12"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Funding should support projects with sustainable revenue models.",
"questionId": "yesno-13"
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Open source software should be allocated the most funding compared to other categories.",
"questionId": "yesno-14"
}
]
}did:plc:s5rbmcvi7o7eljcrl2deutms | at://did:plc:s5rbmcvi7o7eljcrl2deutms/org.simocracy.interview/3mp37i5iuik2i
org.simocracy.sim (nested within org.simocracy.interview) (27 samples)
{
"sim": {
"cid": "bafyreifcpyyd5ds2s5vea7hhoixsf3togz4ixgr5twefswozi4kwzmsucy",
"uri": "at://did:plc:byl3j6d2y2s3h4dpbexntdvj/org.simocracy.sim/3mrxklbw4s22t"
},
"$type": "org.simocracy.interview",
"template": {
"cid": "bafyreihqwpezjm4rck4hhldwp4hltwpvlamkg4ia62pjllb5d26er63cwi",
"uri": "at://did:plc:awtx57rxuisy4sf4kzzr3uhf/org.simocracy.interviewTemplate/3mjtodp56ps2e"
},
"createdAt": "2026-07-31T18:32:30.354Z",
"openAnswers": [],
"yesNoAnswers": [
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Projects with strong community governance should receive preference in funding.",
"questionId": "yesno-1"
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Public goods that effectively demonstrate the benefit of public goods should receive more funding.",
"questionId": "yesno-2"
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Environmental sustainability should be a key factor in funding decisions.",
"questionId": "yesno-3"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Innovation and experimental approaches should be prioritized over proven solutions.",
"questionId": "yesno-4"
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Projects with measurable outcomes should be favored over those with difficult-to-quantify benefits.",
"questionId": "yesno-5"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Funders should be accountable for the funding they provide to the selected projects.",
"questionId": "yesno-6"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Humans are accountable for decisions made by an AI.",
"questionId": "yesno-7"
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Public goods should prioritize immediate community needs over long-term systemic change.",
"questionId": "yesno-8"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Projects that already have a lot of support shouldn't receive additional donations for new small projects.",
"questionId": "yesno-9"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Cost effectiveness should be the primary criterion for funding allocation.",
"questionId": "yesno-10"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Funding decisions should consider geographic equity and underserved populations.",
"questionId": "yesno-11"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Projects that benefit the greatest number of people should be prioritized.",
"questionId": "yesno-12"
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Funding should support projects with sustainable revenue models.",
"questionId": "yesno-13"
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Open source software should be allocated the most funding compared to other categories.",
"questionId": "yesno-14"
}
]
}did:plc:byl3j6d2y2s3h4dpbexntdvj | at://did:plc:byl3j6d2y2s3h4dpbexntdvj/org.simocracy.interview/3mrxloovrhc2t